Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
ITAT ruled that service fees received were not taxable as Fees for Included Services (FIS) under Article 12(4)(b) of India-USA DTAA, consistent with previous treatment of consultancy and training fees in AY 2020-21. DRP findings remained identical across both assessment years. Interest under sections 234A and 234B to be levied as per law. AO directed to verify and allow TDS credit claims according to legal provisions. Regarding incorrect adjustment of refund recovery, AO instructed to examine assessee's claim and modify tax computation in accordance with law. Grounds 4 to 11 were allowed in favor of assessee.
ITAT ruled that service fees received were not taxable as Fees for Included Services (FIS) under Article 12(4)(b) of India-USA DTAA, consistent with previous treatment of consultancy and training fees in AY 2020-21. DRP findings remained identical across both assessment years. Interest under sections 234A and 234B to be levied as per law. AO directed to verify and allow TDS credit claims according to legal provisions. Regarding incorrect adjustment of refund recovery, AO instructed to examine assessee's claim and modify tax computation in accordance with law. Grounds 4 to 11 were allowed in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
