Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT ruled that service fees received were not taxable as Fees for Included Services (FIS) under Article 12(4)(b) of India-USA DTAA, consistent with previous treatment of consultancy and training fees in AY 2020-21. DRP findings remained identical across both assessment years. Interest under sections 234A and 234B to be levied as per law. AO directed to verify and allow TDS credit claims according to legal provisions. Regarding incorrect adjustment of refund recovery, AO instructed to examine assessee's claim and modify tax computation in accordance with law. Grounds 4 to 11 were allowed in favor of assessee.
ITAT ruled that service fees received were not taxable as Fees for Included Services (FIS) under Article 12(4)(b) of India-USA DTAA, consistent with previous treatment of consultancy and training fees in AY 2020-21. DRP findings remained identical across both assessment years. Interest under sections 234A and 234B to be levied as per law. AO directed to verify and allow TDS credit claims according to legal provisions. Regarding incorrect adjustment of refund recovery, AO instructed to examine assessee's claim and modify tax computation in accordance with law. Grounds 4 to 11 were allowed in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
