Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of CESTAT ruled on classification dispute regarding Epoxidised Soya Bean Oil (ESBO). The tribunal upheld classification under CTH 1518 as chemically modified vegetable oil rather than CTH 3812, based on HSN notes and Rule 3(a) of RIT. While the show cause notice was deemed timely (calculated from January 4, 2023, when complete documents were provided), penalties and confiscation were set aside as no misdeclaration was established. The appellant's alternate classification view was considered reasonable given product documentation submitted. Interest on duty remained payable per SKF India precedent. The tribunal emphasized that department's reclassification through DRI investigation was procedurally proper, following Warner Hindustan principles requiring fresh show cause notice. Appeal partially allowed, maintaining duty liability with interest but removing penalties.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
