Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT determined appellant entitled to drawback interest from 14.04.2003 (one month after "let export order" date) rather than from 01.07.2012 as initially granted. Under Customs Act s.75A and Drawback Rules r.13, interest calculation begins one month from customs clearance order, not from date of show cause notice resolution. CESTAT rejected department's prolonged litigation as grounds for delayed interest, noting appellant shouldn't be penalized for departmental proceedings. The tribunal distinguished from Web Knit Exports precedent, emphasizing that export value documentation was complete and verified at initial filing. Appeal succeeded, granting interest from original eligibility date through drawback payment date at s.27A prescribed rate.
CESTAT determined appellant entitled to drawback interest from 14.04.2003 (one month after "let export order" date) rather than from 01.07.2012 as initially granted. Under Customs Act s.75A and Drawback Rules r.13, interest calculation begins one month from customs clearance order, not from date of show cause notice resolution. CESTAT rejected department's prolonged litigation as grounds for delayed interest, noting appellant shouldn't be penalized for departmental proceedings. The tribunal distinguished from Web Knit Exports precedent, emphasizing that export value documentation was complete and verified at initial filing. Appeal succeeded, granting interest from original eligibility date through drawback payment date at s.27A prescribed rate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.