Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
HC denied bail to the accused in a PMLA case involving an extortion racket targeting rice millers. The accused allegedly orchestrated collection of Rs. 40 per quintal from special incentive payments. ED investigation revealed the accused as a key conspirator who facilitated proceeds of crime through threats to withhold MARKFED payments. Despite claims of insufficient direct evidence, the Court found substantial material establishing a money trail and strong nexus between the accused and co-conspirators. Considering the organized nature of the crime, gravity of allegations, and stringent provisions under Section 45 PMLA, the Court rejected bail application under Section 483 BNSS read with Section 45 PMLA for offenses under Sections 3 and 4 PMLA.