Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT allowed appeal regarding classification of Paddle Wheel Aerators used in aquaculture. Initially dismissed by Comm. (Appeals) due to 87-day delay, medical certificate justified late filing. On merits, Tribunal determined that Paddle Wheel Aerators, being agricultural machinery used in fish/shrimp farming, are correctly classifiable under CTH 84368090 (agricultural machinery) rather than CTH 8479. Decision aligned with previous CESTAT ruling which established that paddle wheel aerators used in fisheries/aquaculture fall under heading 8436. Appeal succeeded on both procedural grounds and substantive classification issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.