Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT ruled against addition under s.68 regarding unexplained cash credits from company directors. Directors made payments to 169 individuals for property acquisition on company's behalf, rather than direct loans to company. Documentation included payment confirmations and proper balance sheet entries showing director liabilities. Tribunal held that assessee discharged burden of proof by demonstrating genuine nature of transactions through third-party confirmations and establishing clear money trail for property purchases. The fact that directors obtained unsecured loans to make these payments did not justify addition under s.68 when supported by comprehensive documentation. Addition made by AO and upheld by CIT(A) was deleted.
ITAT ruled against addition under s.68 regarding unexplained cash credits from company directors. Directors made payments to 169 individuals for property acquisition on company's behalf, rather than direct loans to company. Documentation included payment confirmations and proper balance sheet entries showing director liabilities. Tribunal held that assessee discharged burden of proof by demonstrating genuine nature of transactions through third-party confirmations and establishing clear money trail for property purchases. The fact that directors obtained unsecured loans to make these payments did not justify addition under s.68 when supported by comprehensive documentation. Addition made by AO and upheld by CIT(A) was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.