Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
ITAT ruled against addition under s.68 regarding unexplained cash credits from company directors. Directors made payments to 169 individuals for property acquisition on company's behalf, rather than direct loans to company. Documentation included payment confirmations and proper balance sheet entries showing director liabilities. Tribunal held that assessee discharged burden of proof by demonstrating genuine nature of transactions through third-party confirmations and establishing clear money trail for property purchases. The fact that directors obtained unsecured loans to make these payments did not justify addition under s.68 when supported by comprehensive documentation. Addition made by AO and upheld by CIT(A) was deleted.