Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT reversed addition made u/s 69A regarding cash deposits during demonetization period. Assessee's regular books of accounts showed recorded sales proceeds, validated by VAT assessment authorities. Sufficient stock inventory supported legitimate sales transactions during the period. No evidence of fictitious purchases or sales to justify cash deposits was established by AO. CIT(A)'s confirmation of addition deemed legally unsustainable. Consequently, application of higher tax rate u/s 115BBE rejected. The tribunal found no basis for treating bank deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A, given proper documentation and business authenticity. Addition deleted in favor of assessee.
ITAT reversed addition made u/s 69A regarding cash deposits during demonetization period. Assessee's regular books of accounts showed recorded sales proceeds, validated by VAT assessment authorities. Sufficient stock inventory supported legitimate sales transactions during the period. No evidence of fictitious purchases or sales to justify cash deposits was established by AO. CIT(A)'s confirmation of addition deemed legally unsustainable. Consequently, application of higher tax rate u/s 115BBE rejected. The tribunal found no basis for treating bank deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A, given proper documentation and business authenticity. Addition deleted in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
