Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
HC set aside penalty order u/s 270A and notice of demand u/s 156 due to procedural oversight. Department acknowledged they weren't informed about pending appeal proceedings where notice was issued after delay condonation. Matter remitted to National Assessment Unit, NFAC for fresh consideration. Court determined penalty proceedings should have considered existing appeal status before proceeding. Case highlights importance of disclosing concurrent proceedings and proper procedural sequence in tax penalty matters, particularly when appellate authority has already taken cognizance of the main appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.