Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
NCLAT determined that the moratorium period of 180 days u/s 101(1) of IBC is mandatory, not directory, and cannot be extended by either the Adjudicating Authority or the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized that the statutory language is unambiguous, setting a clear outer limit for moratorium either at 180 days from admission or when the Adjudicating Authority passes an order on the Repayment Plan, whichever occurs earlier. The Tribunal distinguished this from provisions like Section 54D and Section 54N, noting that Section 101(1)'s express limitation precludes judicial discretion to extend the moratorium period. The appeal challenging the non-extension of moratorium beyond 180 days during PIRP was dismissed, affirming the statutory cessation of moratorium.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.