Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT dismissed taxpayer's appeal due to procedural deficiencies. Appeal involved 125-day delay without any condonation application being filed. Taxpayer failed to appear for scheduled hearings and did not submit adjournment requests despite receiving hearing notifications. Tribunal proceeded u/r 24 of Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963, which permits ex-parte proceedings in cases of non-appearance. Due to dual non-compliance - failure to justify substantial filing delay and absence during proceedings - appeal was dismissed on procedural grounds without addressing substantive merits.
ITAT dismissed taxpayer's appeal due to procedural deficiencies. Appeal involved 125-day delay without any condonation application being filed. Taxpayer failed to appear for scheduled hearings and did not submit adjournment requests despite receiving hearing notifications. Tribunal proceeded u/r 24 of Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963, which permits ex-parte proceedings in cases of non-appearance. Due to dual non-compliance - failure to justify substantial filing delay and absence during proceedings - appeal was dismissed on procedural grounds without addressing substantive merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
