Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing the deduction of interest expenditure while computing LTCG on sale of a building, treating it as part of the cost of acquisition. This was based on the Delhi HC judgment in Mithlesh Kumari's case. The ITAT noted the proposed amendment in Sec 48 from AY 2024-25 disallowing such interest deduction, clarifying the existing legal position permitting it. Hence, no interference was warranted in the CIT(A)'s order.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing the deduction of interest expenditure while computing LTCG on sale of a building, treating it as part of the cost of acquisition. This was based on the Delhi HC judgment in Mithlesh Kumari's case. The ITAT noted the proposed amendment in Sec 48 from AY 2024-25 disallowing such interest deduction, clarifying the existing legal position permitting it. Hence, no interference was warranted in the CIT(A)'s order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
