Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing the deduction of interest expenditure while computing LTCG on sale of a building, treating it as part of the cost of acquisition. This was based on the Delhi HC judgment in Mithlesh Kumari's case. The ITAT noted the proposed amendment in Sec 48 from AY 2024-25 disallowing such interest deduction, clarifying the existing legal position permitting it. Hence, no interference was warranted in the CIT(A)'s order.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing the deduction of interest expenditure while computing LTCG on sale of a building, treating it as part of the cost of acquisition. This was based on the Delhi HC judgment in Mithlesh Kumari's case. The ITAT noted the proposed amendment in Sec 48 from AY 2024-25 disallowing such interest deduction, clarifying the existing legal position permitting it. Hence, no interference was warranted in the CIT(A)'s order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
