Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Appellants undertook packing/repacking, labeling/re-labeling of machine parts. Issue was classification of earthmoving machines - as automobiles or not. CESTAT held amendment making parts/components/assemblies of earthmoving equipment taxable under "Automobiles" effective prospectively from 29.04.2010, not retrospectively. Earthmoving machines not "automobiles" in common parlance. Amendment to include them under "Automobiles" prospective from 29.04.2010. Impugned orders set aside. Appeal allowed.
Appellants undertook packing/repacking, labeling/re-labeling of machine parts. Issue was classification of earthmoving machines - as automobiles or not. CESTAT held amendment making parts/components/assemblies of earthmoving equipment taxable under "Automobiles" effective prospectively from 29.04.2010, not retrospectively. Earthmoving machines not "automobiles" in common parlance. Amendment to include them under "Automobiles" prospective from 29.04.2010. Impugned orders set aside. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.