Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Petitioner's right to travel abroad, integral to personal liberty under Article 21, cannot be curtailed indefinitely without credible material. While allegations of financial impropriety warrant investigation, absence of evidence of intent to abscond or obstruct investigation necessitates permitting conditional travel abroad. LOC imposed lacks proportionality given SFIO's ability to independently obtain evidence, Petitioner's disclosed foreign assets, and lack of allegations of tampering or intimidation. HC allows conditional travel, subject to applicable conditions and forfeiture of security upon violation, disposing petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.