Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
NCLAT dismissed the contempt application against adjudicating authority. It held no contempt was committed in admitting section 7 application against corporate debtor's project Samhita by order dated 24.08.2023. Adjudicating authority exercised statutory jurisdiction under IBC while admitting section 7 application filed by financial creditors. Initiation of CIRP against Samhita project did not violate or disobey previous NCLAT order dated 13.01.2021. Contempt application lacked merit.
NCLAT dismissed the contempt application against adjudicating authority. It held no contempt was committed in admitting section 7 application against corporate debtor's project Samhita by order dated 24.08.2023. Adjudicating authority exercised statutory jurisdiction under IBC while admitting section 7 application filed by financial creditors. Initiation of CIRP against Samhita project did not violate or disobey previous NCLAT order dated 13.01.2021. Contempt application lacked merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.