Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the impugned order rejecting the one-time settlement (OTS) proposal. It held that the adjudicating authority rightly rejected the OTS proposal as the resolution plan had already been approved. Reopening the proceedings to consider a subsequent settlement proposal would be impermissible after the finality of the approved resolution plan, unless compelling reasons existed, which was not the case here. The appeal against the impugned order was found unmerited.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the impugned order rejecting the one-time settlement (OTS) proposal. It held that the adjudicating authority rightly rejected the OTS proposal as the resolution plan had already been approved. Reopening the proceedings to consider a subsequent settlement proposal would be impermissible after the finality of the approved resolution plan, unless compelling reasons existed, which was not the case here. The appeal against the impugned order was found unmerited.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
