Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The NCLAT held that the Respondent Bank was entitled to invoke the personal guarantee against the Appellant as the principal borrower had failed to discharge the debt. Once the principal borrower defaults, the liability of the personal guarantor gets triggered. The Bank's officer who filed the Section 95 application was duly authorized under the State Bank of India General Regulations, 1955. The appeal was dismissed.
The NCLAT held that the Respondent Bank was entitled to invoke the personal guarantee against the Appellant as the principal borrower had failed to discharge the debt. Once the principal borrower defaults, the liability of the personal guarantor gets triggered. The Bank's officer who filed the Section 95 application was duly authorized under the State Bank of India General Regulations, 1955. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.