Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC set aside the acquittal order u/s 138 of the NI Act. It held that the respondent failed to rebut the presumptions raised against him u/ss 139 and 118 of the NI Act regarding the cheque being issued for discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability. The mere averment of the respondent being financially sound than the appellant, without any supporting material, was insufficient to shift the burden on the appellant to prove means to advance the loan. The matter was listed for further directions.
The HC set aside the acquittal order u/s 138 of the NI Act. It held that the respondent failed to rebut the presumptions raised against him u/ss 139 and 118 of the NI Act regarding the cheque being issued for discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability. The mere averment of the respondent being financially sound than the appellant, without any supporting material, was insufficient to shift the burden on the appellant to prove means to advance the loan. The matter was listed for further directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.