Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
AO accepted assessee company's books of accounts and net profit disclosed therein. However, AO treated cash deposits in bank accounts during demonetization period as unexplained cash credits u/s 68, rejecting assessee's explanation that deposits were from business receipts recorded in books. ITAT held AO cannot accept book results but reject transactions explaining cash availability on 08.11.2016. Cash book showed cash-in-hand of Rs. 12,00,442.54 on 08.11.2016 was consistent with pre and post-demonetization period. No justification to treat deposits as unexplained credits u/s 68. Assessee's appeal allowed.
AO accepted assessee company's books of accounts and net profit disclosed therein. However, AO treated cash deposits in bank accounts during demonetization period as unexplained cash credits u/s 68, rejecting assessee's explanation that deposits were from business receipts recorded in books. ITAT held AO cannot accept book results but reject transactions explaining cash availability on 08.11.2016. Cash book showed cash-in-hand of Rs. 12,00,442.54 on 08.11.2016 was consistent with pre and post-demonetization period. No justification to treat deposits as unexplained credits u/s 68. Assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
