Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The appellant had a bona fide belief that services provided by foreign service providers outside India were not taxable. CESTAT held that since there was revenue neutrality due to availability of CENVAT credit, the extended period for demand could not be invoked as there was no intention to evade service tax. Relying on previous decisions, CESTAT concluded that the demand raised for the extended period was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed.
The appellant had a bona fide belief that services provided by foreign service providers outside India were not taxable. CESTAT held that since there was revenue neutrality due to availability of CENVAT credit, the extended period for demand could not be invoked as there was no intention to evade service tax. Relying on previous decisions, CESTAT concluded that the demand raised for the extended period was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
