Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The AT held that stock split is a price sensitive information as it is likely to impact the price of securities. The UPSI period commenced from March 20, 2017 when the discussion specifically included analysis of stock split for IAL. However, the appellants cannot be considered insiders merely because they subscribed to IAL's pre-IPO preferential allotment. There was no evidence that appellants had access to or possessed UPSI when trading in IAL's scrip. Hence, the appeal was allowed.
The AT held that stock split is a price sensitive information as it is likely to impact the price of securities. The UPSI period commenced from March 20, 2017 when the discussion specifically included analysis of stock split for IAL. However, the appellants cannot be considered insiders merely because they subscribed to IAL's pre-IPO preferential allotment. There was no evidence that appellants had access to or possessed UPSI when trading in IAL's scrip. Hence, the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.