Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The SC held that merely because the respondent was discharged in the predicate offence, the HC cannot quash the summons issued under PMLA. The question of arraying the respondent as an accused is to be decided later, and the respondent can raise relevant contentions, including that the PMLA proceedings cannot sustain if the predicate offence is quashed. The impugned HC order was set aside, allowing the appellant to proceed pursuant to the summons, with all issues left open for the respondent if arrayed as an accused.
The SC held that merely because the respondent was discharged in the predicate offence, the HC cannot quash the summons issued under PMLA. The question of arraying the respondent as an accused is to be decided later, and the respondent can raise relevant contentions, including that the PMLA proceedings cannot sustain if the predicate offence is quashed. The impugned HC order was set aside, allowing the appellant to proceed pursuant to the summons, with all issues left open for the respondent if arrayed as an accused.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.