Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The CESTAT held that goods not unloaded and exported back do not qualify as 'imported goods' under the Customs Act, 1962. The principle of unjust enrichment does not apply to such goods that were not unloaded and were exported back. The refund claim of customs duty paid on the quantity of goods not unloaded needs to be examined afresh without considering unjust enrichment. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
