Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The ITAT held that the assessee, a start-up company with no past financials, had correctly adopted the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method for valuation of unquoted shares u/r 11UA. The rejection of the DCF method by the AO based on disclaimers by the valuer and comparison with actual performance was improper. The ITAT directed the AO to accept the valuation provided by the assessee and delete the additions proposed u/s 56(2)(viib). Additionally, the ITAT held that since the shares were issued to existing shareholders at a premium, the AO cannot invoke Section 68 for the share issue at Rs. 1. Consequently, the grounds raised by the assessee were allowed.
The ITAT held that the assessee, a start-up company with no past financials, had correctly adopted the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method for valuation of unquoted shares u/r 11UA. The rejection of the DCF method by the AO based on disclaimers by the valuer and comparison with actual performance was improper. The ITAT directed the AO to accept the valuation provided by the assessee and delete the additions proposed u/s 56(2)(viib). Additionally, the ITAT held that since the shares were issued to existing shareholders at a premium, the AO cannot invoke Section 68 for the share issue at Rs. 1. Consequently, the grounds raised by the assessee were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.