Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT upheld the Commissioner's order exempting 19 pallets from anti-dumping duty as their Chinese/Taiwanese origin was not proved. While misdeclaration was established for enhancing value and imposing penalty, the burden to prove Taiwanese origin for remaining pallets could not be shifted to the importer solely based on allegations in the show cause notice. As the consignment emanated from a third country, UAE, the 19 unmarked pallets could not be presumed as of Taiwanese origin without evidence. The consequences of misdeclaration cannot extend to reversing statutory rules of evidence beyond valuation and limitation period.
CESTAT upheld the Commissioner's order exempting 19 pallets from anti-dumping duty as their Chinese/Taiwanese origin was not proved. While misdeclaration was established for enhancing value and imposing penalty, the burden to prove Taiwanese origin for remaining pallets could not be shifted to the importer solely based on allegations in the show cause notice. As the consignment emanated from a third country, UAE, the 19 unmarked pallets could not be presumed as of Taiwanese origin without evidence. The consequences of misdeclaration cannot extend to reversing statutory rules of evidence beyond valuation and limitation period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.