Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellant Association, M/s. Lanco Infratech Employees Welfare Association, comprising 212 members, seeking entitlement to 'retention allowance'. The Tribunal held that the members were not entitled to the retention allowance amounting to Rs. 2,80,36,076/- as no service conditions or terms of appointment were provided to establish that the retention allowance formed part of their emoluments or salary payable under the service contract. The endorsement by the then Managing Director and payment slips alone were insufficient to establish the legal enforceability of the retention allowance. However, the Tribunal upheld the entitlement to salary for the month of June 2017, subject to it not being already paid or challenged before a superior forum. The Impugned Order dated 11.03.2024 by the NCLT was found free from apparent error, and the appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
