Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer is required to issue a draft assessment order u/s 144C in cases where there is a variation to the returned income on account of arm's length price adjustments for international or specified domestic transactions, as proposed by the Transfer Pricing Officer. Additionally, for non-resident assessees (other than companies), the Assessing Officer must comply with Section 144C from April 1, 2020, if any variation prejudicial to the assessee's interest is proposed. The Tribunal quashed the final assessment order passed without issuing a draft order as mandated by Section 144C(1), following the Delhi High Court's decision in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sumitomo Corporation India (P.) Ltd.
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer is required to issue a draft assessment order u/s 144C in cases where there is a variation to the returned income on account of arm's length price adjustments for international or specified domestic transactions, as proposed by the Transfer Pricing Officer. Additionally, for non-resident assessees (other than companies), the Assessing Officer must comply with Section 144C from April 1, 2020, if any variation prejudicial to the assessee's interest is proposed. The Tribunal quashed the final assessment order passed without issuing a draft order as mandated by Section 144C(1), following the Delhi High Court's decision in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sumitomo Corporation India (P.) Ltd.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
