Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The High Court allowed the writ petition. Without altering the classification in the shipping bills filed u/s 50, the duty drawback sanctioned to the petitioner cannot be denied by invoking Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. As per the Supreme Court's rulings in Priya Blue Industries Ltd. and ITC Limited cases, while processing a refund application, reassessment is not permitted, nor can conditions of exemption be adjudicated. Reassessment is permitted only u/ss 17(3), (4), and (5). When the law mandates a particular thing to be done in a particular manner, it has to be done in that manner. Thus, there is no legal basis to sustain the impugned order denying the higher rate of duty drawback claimed by the petitioner.
The High Court allowed the writ petition. Without altering the classification in the shipping bills filed u/s 50, the duty drawback sanctioned to the petitioner cannot be denied by invoking Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. As per the Supreme Court's rulings in Priya Blue Industries Ltd. and ITC Limited cases, while processing a refund application, reassessment is not permitted, nor can conditions of exemption be adjudicated. Reassessment is permitted only u/ss 17(3), (4), and (5). When the law mandates a particular thing to be done in a particular manner, it has to be done in that manner. Thus, there is no legal basis to sustain the impugned order denying the higher rate of duty drawback claimed by the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.