Inaccurate-particulars penalties fail where transfer-pricing documentation shows good faith and due diligence, and underlying capital-gains additions ...
Transfer-pricing tolerance for software sub-licensing falls within the services range, eliminating the adjustment and requiring TDS-credit verificatio...
Customs Broker due diligence requires prescribed KYC, not detecting misdeclarations discoverable only through physical examination, defeating licence ...
E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
741 to 760 of 97755 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Supreme Court held that the High Court should formulate the second substantial question of law proposed by the Revenue regarding whether violation of conditions u/s 13(1)(c) would result in denial of exemption on the whole income or be restricted to the income in violation of Section 13(1)(c). The Court directed the High Court to answer this question along with the already admitted question of law, without expressing any final opinion on the merits. The case pertained to the non-admission of a substantial question by the High Court and the deletion of addition made on account of cash donation collected outside the books of accounts by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
The Supreme Court held that the High Court should formulate the second substantial question of law proposed by the Revenue regarding whether violation of conditions u/s 13(1)(c) would result in denial of exemption on the whole income or be restricted to the income in violation of Section 13(1)(c). The Court directed the High Court to answer this question along with the already admitted question of law, without expressing any final opinion on the merits. The case pertained to the non-admission of a substantial question by the High Court and the deletion of addition made on account of cash donation collected outside the books of accounts by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4888 
