TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Directs High Court to Address All Legal Questions in Income Tax Appeal, Including Section 13(1)(c) Violation.</h1> <h3>THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) PUNE Versus SINHAGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY</h3> THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) PUNE Versus SINHAGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY - [2025] 472 ITR 18 (SC) Issues:Challenge to the legality and validity of the High Court's order in an Income Tax Appeal regarding the addition of cash donations and violation of Section 13(1)(c) conditions.Analysis:The Supreme Court addressed a petition filed by the Revenue challenging the High Court's order in an Income Tax Appeal. The High Court had declined to record findings on the substantial questions of law raised by the Revenue. Two substantial questions of law were formulated, one regarding the addition of cash donations made outside the books of accounts and the other concerning the violation of Section 13(1)(c) conditions. The High Court admitted the appeal on the first question but declined to admit it on the second question. The Revenue contended that the second question was not covered by a specific Circular and should have been admitted. The Respondent argued that the High Court did not commit any error in rejecting the second question. The Supreme Court held that since the appeal was already admitted on one substantial question, the High Court should consider the second question as well. The Court directed the High Court to formulate and address the second question along with the already admitted question. The Supreme Court clarified that it did not express a final opinion on the second question, leaving it for the High Court to decide on the merits.This judgment highlights the importance of addressing all substantial questions of law raised in an appeal. The Supreme Court emphasized the need for thorough consideration of all issues, even if one question has already been admitted. The Court directed the High Court to include and decide on the second substantial question raised by the Revenue, ensuring a comprehensive examination of all legal issues involved in the case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
