Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The High Court allowed the petition, declaring that the petitioner is entitled to authorization to import an additional 8,000 Metric Tonnes of Maize Corn/Pop Corn. The Court held that the respondents' refusal to grant the balance authorization of 8,000 Metric Tonnes to the petitioner for importing Maize Corn/Pop Corn was arbitrary and violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. The Court directed the respondents to issue the authorization for the remaining 8,000 Metric Tonnes expeditiously, within four weeks from the date of the order. The Court found that the restrictions imposed by granting authorization for only 2,000 Metric Tonnes were without statutory backing u/ss 3 and 9A of the Act of 1992 and the Foreign Trade Policy 2023. The exercise of discretion by the respondents in limiting the authorization was held to be unfair and contrary to the principles of due process and legitimate expectation.
The High Court allowed the petition, declaring that the petitioner is entitled to authorization to import an additional 8,000 Metric Tonnes of Maize Corn/Pop Corn. The Court held that the respondents' refusal to grant the balance authorization of 8,000 Metric Tonnes to the petitioner for importing Maize Corn/Pop Corn was arbitrary and violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. The Court directed the respondents to issue the authorization for the remaining 8,000 Metric Tonnes expeditiously, within four weeks from the date of the order. The Court found that the restrictions imposed by granting authorization for only 2,000 Metric Tonnes were without statutory backing u/ss 3 and 9A of the Act of 1992 and the Foreign Trade Policy 2023. The exercise of discretion by the respondents in limiting the authorization was held to be unfair and contrary to the principles of due process and legitimate expectation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
