Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The NCLAT held that the deposit of Rs.17,12,094/- by VE Commercial Vehicles Limited before the Commercial Tax Department, in response to a notice for reversing the input tax availed by it as the Corporate Debtor had not deposited the GST amount, did not constitute a preferential transaction u/s 43 of the IBC or violation of the moratorium u/s 14. The Commercial Tax Department did not recover any amount from the Corporate Debtor or its assets. VE Commercial Vehicles Limited had merely reversed the input tax benefit taken by it. The NCLAT allowed the appeal and set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order directing VE Commercial Vehicles Limited to refund the amount.
The NCLAT held that the deposit of Rs.17,12,094/- by VE Commercial Vehicles Limited before the Commercial Tax Department, in response to a notice for reversing the input tax availed by it as the Corporate Debtor had not deposited the GST amount, did not constitute a preferential transaction u/s 43 of the IBC or violation of the moratorium u/s 14. The Commercial Tax Department did not recover any amount from the Corporate Debtor or its assets. VE Commercial Vehicles Limited had merely reversed the input tax benefit taken by it. The NCLAT allowed the appeal and set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order directing VE Commercial Vehicles Limited to refund the amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
