Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The recipients were non-residents without any permanent establishment or business connection in India. The services were rendered outside India for which commission was paid, and the income accrued outside India. Consequently, no tax deduction at source (TDS) u/s 195 was liable to be made, and the disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) did not apply. The non-resident recipients had no presence or business activities in India, rendering their services entirely from abroad. Therefore, the assessee was not obligated to deduct TDS, and the appeal was allowed.
The recipients were non-residents without any permanent establishment or business connection in India. The services were rendered outside India for which commission was paid, and the income accrued outside India. Consequently, no tax deduction at source (TDS) u/s 195 was liable to be made, and the disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) did not apply. The non-resident recipients had no presence or business activities in India, rendering their services entirely from abroad. Therefore, the assessee was not obligated to deduct TDS, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
