Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The High Court examined whether the assessee had constructed a residential house on agricultural land within the stipulated three-year period from the date of transfer of property to claim deduction u/s 54. The court held that the allowance is available if capital gains from the sale of a residential property are utilized for purchasing a residential property or constructing a residential house, implying raising a construction for inhabitation as a residential dwelling unit. The Inspector's report accepted by the ITAT revealed only makeshift guardrooms made of plywood sheets without electricity or water connection on the site. The court opined that putting together plywood sheets cannot be construed as constructing a residential house. The ITAT's findings were not perverse or manifestly erroneous, considering the description of the property. Therefore, no question of law arose for the court's consideration.
The High Court examined whether the assessee had constructed a residential house on agricultural land within the stipulated three-year period from the date of transfer of property to claim deduction u/s 54. The court held that the allowance is available if capital gains from the sale of a residential property are utilized for purchasing a residential property or constructing a residential house, implying raising a construction for inhabitation as a residential dwelling unit. The Inspector's report accepted by the ITAT revealed only makeshift guardrooms made of plywood sheets without electricity or water connection on the site. The court opined that putting together plywood sheets cannot be construed as constructing a residential house. The ITAT's findings were not perverse or manifestly erroneous, considering the description of the property. Therefore, no question of law arose for the court's consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.