Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Cognizance of money laundering offense by Trial Court valid despite ongoing investigation. Retrospective applicability of Explanation-II to Section 44(1)(b) PMLA upheld. Impugned order valid, no violation of natural justice principles. Special Court can take cognizance based on ED's complaint u/s 3 PMLA. CrPC provisions on investigation, bail, preliminary procedures applicable to PMLA cases unless stated otherwise. ED can file supplementary complaint for additional evidence against accused. Initial PMLA complaint permissible even during ongoing investigation due to Explanation-II introduced in 2019 allowing supplementary complaints. No illegality in Trial Court order, petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.