Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Non-fulfilment of export obligation under Advance Authorization by importer company. Penalty imposed on directors solely based on their shareholding and directorship, without establishing their role in the alleged offence. Separate proceedings already initiated against the company for duty-free import and non-fulfilment. Penalty u/s 112(a) and (b) of Customs Act imposed together, legally unsustainable. Ingredients for imposing penalty u/s 112 not existing. Penalties on directors set aside by Appellate Tribunal as unsustainable.
Non-fulfilment of export obligation under Advance Authorization by importer company. Penalty imposed on directors solely based on their shareholding and directorship, without establishing their role in the alleged offence. Separate proceedings already initiated against the company for duty-free import and non-fulfilment. Penalty u/s 112(a) and (b) of Customs Act imposed together, legally unsustainable. Ingredients for imposing penalty u/s 112 not existing. Penalties on directors set aside by Appellate Tribunal as unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
