Fraud classification show-cause notices founded on inconclusive forensic audit material cannot sustain action, permitting fresh proceedings on conclus...
Appellate enhancement limits protect against new income sources, while documented credits and prior-year investments resist unexplained-income additio...
Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided. Once a company proves existence and authenticity of shareholders, it discharges burden u/s 68. Share premium is a matter of business prerogative, and revenue cannot question its quantum without evidence of collusion or mala fide intent. If an assessee sufficiently establishes identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share capital transaction, addition u/s 68 as unexplained cash credit is unsustainable and should be deleted by the Assessing Officer.
Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided. Once a company proves existence and authenticity of shareholders, it discharges burden u/s 68. Share premium is a matter of business prerogative, and revenue cannot question its quantum without evidence of collusion or mala fide intent. If an assessee sufficiently establishes identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share capital transaction, addition u/s 68 as unexplained cash credit is unsustainable and should be deleted by the Assessing Officer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.