Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided. Once a company proves existence and authenticity of shareholders, it discharges burden u/s 68. Share premium is a matter of business prerogative, and revenue cannot question its quantum without evidence of collusion or mala fide intent. If an assessee sufficiently establishes identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share capital transaction, addition u/s 68 as unexplained cash credit is unsustainable and should be deleted by the Assessing Officer.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
