Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The Registrar of Companies, Chennai, acting as the Adjudicating Officer u/s 454(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, found non-compliance with Rule 14(6) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 by the company and its directors. Consequently, a penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed on the company and Rs. 10,000 on the officers in default, totaling Rs. 20,000, as prescribed u/s 450 of the Companies Act, 2013. The penalty amount is to be paid online within 90 days of receiving the order, and proof of payment is to be submitted to the office.
The Registrar of Companies, Chennai, acting as the Adjudicating Officer u/s 454(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, found non-compliance with Rule 14(6) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 by the company and its directors. Consequently, a penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed on the company and Rs. 10,000 on the officers in default, totaling Rs. 20,000, as prescribed u/s 450 of the Companies Act, 2013. The penalty amount is to be paid online within 90 days of receiving the order, and proof of payment is to be submitted to the office.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
