Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Appellate Tribunal set aside orders denying remission of excise duty on indigenous goods and customs duty on imported goods destroyed in factory fire. Tribunal found no dispute regarding fire incident and destruction of goods, appellant received insurance claim, no evidence of mischief or carelessness by appellant. Commissioner raised deficiencies in remission application without giving appellant opportunity to explain. Matter remanded to Commissioner for reconsideration of remission application after giving proper opportunity to appellant to address queries raised. Consequential demands of duty also set aside for fresh adjudication along with remission application by competent authority.
Appellate Tribunal set aside orders denying remission of excise duty on indigenous goods and customs duty on imported goods destroyed in factory fire. Tribunal found no dispute regarding fire incident and destruction of goods, appellant received insurance claim, no evidence of mischief or carelessness by appellant. Commissioner raised deficiencies in remission application without giving appellant opportunity to explain. Matter remanded to Commissioner for reconsideration of remission application after giving proper opportunity to appellant to address queries raised. Consequential demands of duty also set aside for fresh adjudication along with remission application by competent authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
