Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Appellate Tribunal set aside orders denying remission of excise duty on indigenous goods and customs duty on imported goods destroyed in factory fire. Tribunal found no dispute regarding fire incident and destruction of goods, appellant received insurance claim, no evidence of mischief or carelessness by appellant. Commissioner raised deficiencies in remission application without giving appellant opportunity to explain. Matter remanded to Commissioner for reconsideration of remission application after giving proper opportunity to appellant to address queries raised. Consequential demands of duty also set aside for fresh adjudication along with remission application by competent authority.
Appellate Tribunal set aside orders denying remission of excise duty on indigenous goods and customs duty on imported goods destroyed in factory fire. Tribunal found no dispute regarding fire incident and destruction of goods, appellant received insurance claim, no evidence of mischief or carelessness by appellant. Commissioner raised deficiencies in remission application without giving appellant opportunity to explain. Matter remanded to Commissioner for reconsideration of remission application after giving proper opportunity to appellant to address queries raised. Consequential demands of duty also set aside for fresh adjudication along with remission application by competent authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
