Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Onus on assessee to explain exorbitant increase in transport expenses and support with proper bills/vouchers, which assessee failed. Sample bills/vouchers not for transport expense, lacking lorry details, origin and destination. Bills for purchase of materials like sand, mentioning 'transportation' but not actual transport expenses. Evidence not explaining abnormal increase in transport expense despite substantial increase in petrol expense. Cogent explanation and complete bills/vouchers lacking, hence addition confirmed by CIT(A) upheld by ITAT. Decided against assessee.
Onus on assessee to explain exorbitant increase in transport expenses and support with proper bills/vouchers, which assessee failed. Sample bills/vouchers not for transport expense, lacking lorry details, origin and destination. Bills for purchase of materials like sand, mentioning 'transportation' but not actual transport expenses. Evidence not explaining abnormal increase in transport expense despite substantial increase in petrol expense. Cogent explanation and complete bills/vouchers lacking, hence addition confirmed by CIT(A) upheld by ITAT. Decided against assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
