Unverified Insight Portal Information Cannot Justify Reassessment Without a Verified Taxpayer-Specific Income-Escape Nexus or Demonstrated Application...
Assessing Officer jurisdiction after statutory transfer invalidates reassessment notices issued by transferor officers and nullifies resulting proceed...
Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range c...
Discounted cash flow valuation protects share premium where projections are reasonable, while audited book expenses defeat unexplained-expenditure add...
Section 54 construction relief survives pre-transfer commencement when completion occurs within the statutory period, excluding ineligible spouse-owne...
The assessee claimed deduction of expenditure incurred for handling and disposal of spent solvents/scrap against unaccounted cash receipts from their sale. The ITAT held that while there is no direct evidence, the possibility of incurring such expenditure cannot be ruled out considering the nature of materials. It estimated 60% of receipts as reasonable expenditure. Regarding addition of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) and consequent dividend distribution tax, the ITAT held that payments to associated concerns were trade advances in the ordinary course of business and not loans/advances attracting deemed dividend. The transactions were current adjustment account entries reflecting movement of funds both ways as per business requirements among group companies, not loans/advances to shareholders. Payments were utilized for recipient companies' business, not diverted to common substantial shareholder's benefit. Hence, the ITAT deleted the addition of deemed dividend and consequent levy of dividend distribution tax.
The assessee claimed deduction of expenditure incurred for handling and disposal of spent solvents/scrap against unaccounted cash receipts from their sale. The ITAT held that while there is no direct evidence, the possibility of incurring such expenditure cannot be ruled out considering the nature of materials. It estimated 60% of receipts as reasonable expenditure. Regarding addition of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) and consequent dividend distribution tax, the ITAT held that payments to associated concerns were trade advances in the ordinary course of business and not loans/advances attracting deemed dividend. The transactions were current adjustment account entries reflecting movement of funds both ways as per business requirements among group companies, not loans/advances to shareholders. Payments were utilized for recipient companies' business, not diverted to common substantial shareholder's benefit. Hence, the ITAT deleted the addition of deemed dividend and consequent levy of dividend distribution tax.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
