<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Tribunal Allows Deduction for Solvent Disposal; Deemed Dividend Addition Deleted as Trade Advances Confirmed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83036</link>
    <description>The assessee claimed deduction of expenditure incurred for handling and disposal of spent solvents/scrap against unaccounted cash receipts from their sale. The ITAT held that while there is no direct evidence, the possibility of incurring such expenditure cannot be ruled out considering the nature of materials. It estimated 60% of receipts as reasonable expenditure. Regarding addition of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) and consequent dividend distribution tax, the ITAT held that payments to associated concerns were trade advances in the ordinary course of business and not loans/advances attracting deemed dividend. The transactions were current adjustment account entries reflecting movement of funds both ways as per business requirements among .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 08:52:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 08:52:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Tribunal Allows Deduction for Solvent Disposal; Deemed Dividend Addition Deleted as Trade Advances Confirmed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83036</link>
      <description>The assessee claimed deduction of expenditure incurred for handling and disposal of spent solvents/scrap against unaccounted cash receipts from their sale. The ITAT held that while there is no direct evidence, the possibility of incurring such expenditure cannot be ruled out considering the nature of materials. It estimated 60% of receipts as reasonable expenditure. Regarding addition of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) and consequent dividend distribution tax, the ITAT held that payments to associated concerns were trade advances in the ordinary course of business and not loans/advances attracting deemed dividend. The transactions were current adjustment account entries reflecting movement of funds both ways as per business requirements among .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 08:52:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>