Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rule 6(A) requires filing separate appeals for each order-in-original. In a case involving multiple Bills of Entry, if a common order-in-appeal disposed of appeals covering 13 Bills of Entry, the Revenue is required to file 13 separate appeals challenging each Bill of Entry, which is an assessment order itself. The Tribunal held that the present single appeal filed by the Revenue against 13 Bills of Entry is not maintainable. The Revenue is directed to file 13 separate appeals if they wish to challenge the order, as per the interpretation of Rule 6(A) by the Ahmedabad Bench in CMR Nikkie India Pvt Ltd case.
Rule 6(A) requires filing separate appeals for each order-in-original. In a case involving multiple Bills of Entry, if a common order-in-appeal disposed of appeals covering 13 Bills of Entry, the Revenue is required to file 13 separate appeals challenging each Bill of Entry, which is an assessment order itself. The Tribunal held that the present single appeal filed by the Revenue against 13 Bills of Entry is not maintainable. The Revenue is directed to file 13 separate appeals if they wish to challenge the order, as per the interpretation of Rule 6(A) by the Ahmedabad Bench in CMR Nikkie India Pvt Ltd case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
