Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Rule 6(A) requires filing separate appeals for each order-in-original. In a case involving multiple Bills of Entry, if a common order-in-appeal disposed of appeals covering 13 Bills of Entry, the Revenue is required to file 13 separate appeals challenging each Bill of Entry, which is an assessment order itself. The Tribunal held that the present single appeal filed by the Revenue against 13 Bills of Entry is not maintainable. The Revenue is directed to file 13 separate appeals if they wish to challenge the order, as per the interpretation of Rule 6(A) by the Ahmedabad Bench in CMR Nikkie India Pvt Ltd case.
Rule 6(A) requires filing separate appeals for each order-in-original. In a case involving multiple Bills of Entry, if a common order-in-appeal disposed of appeals covering 13 Bills of Entry, the Revenue is required to file 13 separate appeals challenging each Bill of Entry, which is an assessment order itself. The Tribunal held that the present single appeal filed by the Revenue against 13 Bills of Entry is not maintainable. The Revenue is directed to file 13 separate appeals if they wish to challenge the order, as per the interpretation of Rule 6(A) by the Ahmedabad Bench in CMR Nikkie India Pvt Ltd case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
