Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
In a case concerning disallowance of loss incurred in a plastic division, the assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting, and contracts were accounted for on an accrual basis. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the revenue appeal, holding that tax is levied on real income with aspects of certainty. The High Court upheld the ITAT's decision, considering the Supreme Court's ruling in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Excel Industries Ltd., which emphasized levying tax on real income rather than hypothetical income. The settlement agreement acknowledged the contract's partial disintegration, causing the assessee to lose the right to receive the full transaction value. Accounting Standards (AS) 4 and 9 were considered for contingencies occurring after the balance sheet date. The High Court found no manifest error in the ITAT's judgment favoring the assessee.
In a case concerning disallowance of loss incurred in a plastic division, the assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting, and contracts were accounted for on an accrual basis. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the revenue appeal, holding that tax is levied on real income with aspects of certainty. The High Court upheld the ITAT's decision, considering the Supreme Court's ruling in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Excel Industries Ltd., which emphasized levying tax on real income rather than hypothetical income. The settlement agreement acknowledged the contract's partial disintegration, causing the assessee to lose the right to receive the full transaction value. Accounting Standards (AS) 4 and 9 were considered for contingencies occurring after the balance sheet date. The High Court found no manifest error in the ITAT's judgment favoring the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
