Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Imported goods classified under incorrect tariff heading, appellants denied opportunity for cross-examination and access to test reports, violation of natural justice principles. CESTAT remanded matter to original adjudicating authority with directions to provide test report copies, allow cross-examination of CEPCI representatives. Appellants' submissions regarding roasting method, buyer specifications, third-party certifications not adequately examined. Onus on revenue to establish claimed classification in case of divergent interpretations. Appeal allowed for remand to address procedural lapses.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.